Part of the Learn Without Limits CIC knowledge base for ALN families in Wales.

Generation After Generation: Why Families in Wales Are Still Slipping Through the Cracks

There is a pattern that is becoming harder to ignore.

Generation after generation, cohort after cohort, children, young people and adults continue to slip through the cracks. Not because need is invisible. Not because families are not trying. But because too often, systems are not designed around what people actually need in order to participate.

They are designed around what can be offered.

Support in theory, misaligned in practice

Across education, health and wider support systems, provision often exists on paper. There are policies, pathways, programmes and funding streams.

But in practice, families frequently encounter something very different.

Support is shaped by:

  • what is already commissioned
  • what is easy to administer
  • what fits standardised models
  • what providers are set up to deliver

rather than what would actually enable the individual.

This creates a situation where support is technically present, but practically misaligned.

A funded activity without transport is not accessible.
A classroom assistant who supervises but cannot adapt learning is not meaningful support.
A one-size-fits-all support plan does not meet complex or individual needs.

The problem is not always the absence of support.

It is support that does not work.

This misalignment is explored further in our earlier article, When Children Cannot Attend School in Wales: The Families Support Systems Often Forget.

Compliance is expected. Gratitude is implied.

Alongside this, there is an unspoken expectation about how families should engage.

Parents and carers quickly learn that they must:

  • communicate carefully
  • remain calm
  • avoid causing offence
  • follow processes exactly

even when they are dealing with prolonged stress and uncertainty.

At the same time, many report that:

  • their concerns are not fully heard
  • communication can be dismissive or inconsistent
  • accountability is uneven

Over time, this creates an imbalance.

The burden of maintaining “appropriate” engagement falls disproportionately on families, while the system itself is not always held to the same standard.

For many, this is not occasional.

It is constant.

The emotional and practical impact of this is closely connected to what we explored in When No One Talks About the Long-Term Cost to Families.

What children learn early

These dynamics do not begin in adulthood.

Children learn early how systems respond to difference.

They learn:

  • whether their needs are understood or minimised
  • whether support is responsive or conditional
  • whether they are helped to access learning or expected to fit into it

For some, school becomes a place where:

  • needs are not met
  • engagement becomes harder
  • anxiety increases
  • exclusion, formal or informal, becomes more likely

For others, the experience is quieter but just as significant: support that exists, but never quite enables.

These experiences accumulate.

A lifetime pattern

What starts in early education often continues across life stages.

Adolescents who cannot meet expectations may:

  • disengage
  • be labelled as challenging
  • or fall out of education altogether

Adults navigating systems may find:

  • that their ability to advocate is shaped by past experience
  • that raising concerns feels risky
  • that opportunities are framed as “support” even when they rely on unpaid labour

That same pattern sits behind the issues explored in:

In some cases, pathways narrow rather than expand.

The long-term impact is not just individual. It is generational.

Today’s toddler is tomorrow’s parent.

A child who cannot access school today may become an adult who struggles to access work. That adult may later be supporting a child facing the same barriers.

And so the pattern repeats.

For many families, this is not a hypothetical future. It is a cycle they are already living.

The official figures point in the same direction. In Wales, 17.0% of 16 to 24-year-olds were not in education, employment or training in the year ending September 2025, and disabled young people were far more likely to be NEET. The rate was 18.0% for disabled 16 to 18-year-olds and 39.9% for disabled 19 to 24-year-olds in the three-year period ending September 2025 [1].

When intervention comes too late

There is a point at which systems stop being preventative and become reactive.

When needs are not met early:

  • disengagement increases
  • trust breaks down
  • opportunities narrow

For some individuals, this can lead to involvement with services later in life that were never intended to be part of their pathway.

It is not uncommon for professionals in areas such as criminal justice, mental health, or adult services to encounter individuals whose earlier needs were not effectively supported within education.

Official data from England points to the same pattern. Ministry of Justice analysis found that 78% of prison leavers matched to school records had SEN identified while at school. It also found that 62% of prison leavers who had been severely absent from school and 43% of those who had been permanently excluded later participated in prison education [2].

By that stage, the focus is often on managing outcomes rather than preventing them.

Too often, professionals are working with the consequences of needs that could have been addressed much earlier.

Education outside school is rising

The same pattern is visible within the education system itself.

In Wales, 3,014 pupils received some type of EOTAS provision in 2024/25, including 2,684 whose main education was outside school. The rate of pupils mainly educated outside school, 5.8 per 1,000 pupils, was the highest since records began in 2009/10 [3].

Pupils with ALN or SEN are disproportionately represented in those figures. In 2024/25, the rate of pupils mainly educated outside school was 47.8 per 1,000 for those with any SEN or ALN provision, compared with 5.8 per 1,000 overall. For pupils with a local authority maintained IDP, the rate was 134.4 per 1,000 [3].

Elective home education has also risen sharply. In 2024/25, 7,176 children were known to be electively home educated in Wales, a rate of 15.3 per 1,000 pupils, up from 1.6 per 1,000 in 2009/10 [3].

Welsh Government has also stated plainly that “a large number of children who are home-educated have ALN” [4].

These trends do not point to a small or isolated issue.

They point to a system where increasing numbers of families are no longer able to access education in a way that meets their needs.

When people stop engaging

There is another consequence that is less visible, but just as important.

When people feel that:

  • their experience is not reflected
  • their input does not lead to change
  • engagement requires constant self-regulation

they begin to disengage.

This shows up as:

  • lower participation in consultations and surveys
  • reduced trust in services
  • delayed or avoided help-seeking

Over time, this creates a gap between what is reported and what is actually happening.

When people are not visible in the data, they are less likely to be prioritised.

This is not about one organisation

This is not about any single service, provider, or professional.

It is about a structural pattern:

  • support designed around systems rather than individuals
  • engagement that relies on families carrying the emotional burden
  • data that does not fully capture lived experience
  • funding that prioritises process over practical, early support

Individually, these issues may seem manageable.

Together, they create a system where too many people fall through the gaps.

A different approach is possible

If we want different outcomes, we need to change what is prioritised.

That means:

  • designing support around what enables participation, not what is easiest to deliver
  • recognising the value of early, preventative intervention
  • ensuring that people can speak openly without fear of negative consequences
  • valuing contribution appropriately, including paid pathways where skills are used
  • capturing the full reality of people’s experiences, not just what fits existing categories

There are working models emerging that are trying to do this.

The question is whether they will be supported in time to scale.

A practical model already exists in our own Prevent, Bridging, and Progression in the ALN System framework, which explains how early guidance, re-engagement support, and clearer onward pathways can work together in practice.

You can also watch the short overview video here: Prevent -> Bridge -> Progress overview.

The cost of doing nothing

If nothing changes, the pattern will continue.

Generation after generation, cohort after cohort, people will slip through the cracks.

Public systems will continue to spend more reacting to crisis while missing opportunities to prevent it.

And families will continue to carry the cost, emotionally, financially, and across generations.

This is not inevitable.

But it does require a shift in what is funded, prioritised, and scaled.

References

[1] Welsh Government - Young people not in education, employment or training (NEET), October 2024 to September 2025

[2] Ministry of Justice - Prison education in England: Educational background, characteristics and criminogenic needs

[3] Welsh Government - Pupils educated other than at school, September 2024 to August 2025

[4] Welsh Government - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill and elective home education